In this paper we argue that the world-system of global knowledge production, that is, the field of transnational academia, could be conceived as a rather hegemonic and exclusivist social subsystem in which not just the members of the hegemon group, viz. the central agents of the field, but also the underprivileged agents operate in a way that maintains and even reinforces this uneven systemic run. According to our argumentation, the peripheral agents of the system tend to camouflage their identities as non-Western scholars to be acknowledged by the global community. Our subsequent analysis of the dynamics of former emancipatory movements will show that this is a detrimental strategy since assimilation results in homogenization and in losing authentic voices. As opposed to assimilation through camouflaging identity, we propose a systemic protagonism beside geopolitical equality in the world-system of knowledge production through the development of authentic and equal, other than Western, identities in transnational academia. Read Full Text
Taking off camouflage identities: why peripheral scholars strive to look like their Western peers in order to being recognized?
RELATED
Campos Rueda, M. (2025). Explaining Expectations-Evaluation Discrepancies: The Role of Consumption and Populist Attitudes in Shaping Citizens’ Perceptions of PSM Performance. Journalism Practice, 19(4), 803–821.
Goyanes, M., Demeter, M., Simeunović-Bajić, N., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2024). Gender disparities in first authorship: Examining the Matilda effect across communication, political science, and sociology. Scientometrics, 130, 2947–2961.
Demeter, M., Goyanes, M., Kohus, Z., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2024). Exploring the link between research funding, co-authorship and publication venues: An empirical study in communication, political science, and sociology. Online Media and Global Communication, 4(1), 60–81.
Rajkó, A., Herendy, C., Goyanes, M., & Demeter, M. (2024). The Matilda effect in communication research: The effects of gender and geography on usage and citations across 11 countries. Communication Research, 52(2), 209–232.
Demeter, M., Goyanes, M., Háló, G., & Xu, X. (2024). The internationalization of Chinese social sciences research: Publication, collaboration, and citation patterns in economics, education, and political science. Policy Reviews in Higher Education, 9(1), 81–107.
Goyanes, M., Scheffauer, R., Tóth, T., Demeter, M., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2024). Online news paying intent antecedents: The culture of free, fairness of having to pay for news, and the moderating role of political interest. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly.
Cañedo, A., Demeter, M., & Goyanes, M. (2024). The nonpartisan, the equidistant and the allied: How journalists negotiate their digital selves on social media. Journalism, 25(6), 1365–1382.
Tóth, T., Goyanes, M., & Demeter, M. (2024). Extend the context! Measuring explicit and implicit populism on three different textual levels. Communications, 49(2), 222–242.
Blasco-Blasco, O., Demeter, M., & Goyanes, M. (2024). A contribution-based indicator of research productivity: Theoretical definition and empirical testing in the field of communication. Online Information Review, 48(4), 823–840.
Goyanes, M., Demeter, M., Háló, G., Arcila-Calderón, C., & Gil de Zúñiga, H. (2024). Geographical and gender inequalities in health sciences studies: Testing differences in research productivity, impact, and visibility. Online Information Review, 48(4), 803–822.